In my high school debate class we were taught to develop a sound argument for and against each proposition. Prior to a debate we didn’t know which side of the proposition we would be asked to defend so we had to be prepared to support either side. It taught us good debating technique and a good life skill.
There are always two sides (or three, or four…) to every situation. We are usually predisposed to one particular view so it takes concerted effort to think of other perspectives. We usually don’t make that effort; it’s easier to embrace our default position and avoid the intellectual rigor that dialectic thinking requires.
A friend of mine whom I’ll call Chris (because that’s his name) told me that his favorite teacher in high school had a wonderful technique for developing dialectic thinking in his students. If a student made a declaratory statement the teacher would respond with the phrase, “Yes, but on the other hand…” But—here’s the nice twist—the teacher wouldn’t fill in the blank, he required the student to do so.
So, a discussion might sound like this:
Student: “I think it’s wrong for governments to control whether or not chlorine is added to our drinking water.”
Teacher: “Yes, but on the other hand, tell me why it’s a good idea for governments to control that issue.”
One of the keys to thinking well is not so much what you think but how you think, and an important aspect of how you think is to discipline yourself to pursue the multiple perspectives that surround all issues.
At a recent weekly family dinner (my favorite, reoccurring experience) we explored dialectic thinking by staging a debate. I proposed this proposition: We should only bathe once a week. [I had recently read a report in which a group of dermatologist recommended this practice.] Lauren and Jonathan were teamed together against Mary and me. We randomly assigned which team was for the proposition and which team was against it. Then the debate began. It produced a fun and intellectually stimulating exercise that also forced us to consider the issue from multiple perspectives.
I didn’t bathe for three days.
[reminder]What are your thoughts about this essay?[/reminder]
[callout]12 best books I read last year – book 5 of 12
Made to Stick: Why Some Ideas Survive and Others Die – Heath and Heath, 2007. Lean six traits that make ideas durable. A must read for those to want to communicate, well. Click here for more information from Amazon. [/callout]
6 Replies to ““Yes, but on the other hand…” (the value of dialectic thinking)”
Don, your posts are supposed to stimulate my thinking, not stimulate my sense of humor! (Of course, this post also stimulates my olfactory sense.) Thanks for giving all three a nice kick in the pants.
Ha. Thanks, Wayne, for taking the time to comment. It was, indeed, a fun discussion.
Very good essay. When I was employed (I am retired now) I used the “Yes but…” approach numerous times and I find myself using it at times now. Once again great essay! Keep em’ coming.
This is Law School, every class, every day in front of as many as 150 peers! Sad observation is that when it comes to hot or personal topics our past and unconscious sneak in and emotionally charged reactions take front and center stage. Additionally, we tend to be so fearful of other points of view that we do not force ourselves to explore other perspectives. Reading broadly and extended living with other cultures-that can shake the cobwebs out. Thanks, Don
Randy, it’s so good to hear your “voice.” I agree, we tend to stay in intellectual and ideological ruts. The phrase “question everything” has merit. Don