
To be a good writer you have to have a good, built-in, shock-proof bullshit detector. Ernest Hemingway
Hemingway surmised that to be a good writer you had to be able to see through the folderol and not be duped by manipulation and deceit. If I may, I’ll rewrite his sentence to read, “To be a wise person you have to have a good, built-in, shock-proof crap-detector.” I have extended the application to all persons and chosen a slightly more socially acceptable term.
A crap detector is fueled by healthy skepticism. We all need a dose of skepticism because it protects against naiveté and being taken advantage of.
Be suspicious of advertising, PR, and marketing.
Most advertising is propaganda; it is self-serving manipulation. It is biased and often misleading. It blurs the distinction between perception and reality. When you hear a radio ad say “AAA Plumbing Company really loves its customers,” don’t be fooled. Of course they’re going to say that. Would you expect them to say “We really don’t care much about our customers; we just want your money”?
Fortunately, the Internet has given consumers new tools to see through the haze and shop smartly. Customer reviews can provide clear insights into products and services. So don’t fall prey to Madison Avenue.
Be distrustful whenever money is being exchanged.
Chances are good that the AC repairman is overcharging you. The suggested auto repairs your local Firestone store is recommending may be unnecessary. The medical treatments proposed by your doctor may or may not be necessary.
That’s why it’s prudent to always get multiple opinions and multiple bids. If you always get at least five bids on all products and services, you’ll typically save around 30%.
Be wary of political rhetoric.
I don’t listen to either Fox News or CNBC because neither reports unadulterated news; they give biased commentary on select topics. Interestingly, the BBC is a more impartial and reliable source for news about American politics and events. The Economist magazine, printed in Great Britain, is also a good source.
During political campaigns, it’s hard to trust what candidates are saying, because their messages are constantly being adjusted based on public opinion.
Be skeptical.
I’m not advocating philosophical skepticism, a branch of philosophy that questions the notion of absolute truth. I am promoting practical skepticism, a mindset that seeks to identify and debunk both intentional and unintentional falsehood.
Don’t be consumed by skepticism or allow it to morph into cynicism; it should not define your personality or outlook on life; not everyone is out to “get you.” You don’t want to be known as a negative, crotchety, and sullen cynic. But you do want to be wise, insightful and prudent.
Brian Dunning shares these interesting thoughts on skepticism:
“The true meaning of the word skepticism has nothing to do with doubt, disbelief, or negativity. Skepticism is the process of applying reason and critical thinking to determine validity. It’s the process of finding a supported conclusion, not the justification of a preconceived conclusion.
“The scientific method is central to skepticism. The scientific method requires evidence, preferably derived from validated testing. Anecdotal evidence and personal testimonies generally don’t meet the qualifications for scientific evidence, and thus won’t often be accepted by a responsible skeptic; which often explains why skeptics get such a bad rap for being negative or disbelieving people. They’re simply following the scientific method.” (Brian Dunning © 2015 skeptoid.com)

Question, then verify…isn’t that what Pastor Chuck said? Maybe I’m not using the direct quote, but I do remember him saying something similar.
Speaking of the news outlets, there is a young man that lives in GB, and has a news media outlet under his last name: Tousi— go to YouTube and search him out—he delivers news from around the world; check CBN out, also!
Hi Gail. I like the phrase “question, then verify”; I’m not sure if I ever heard that from Chuck, but he certainly thinks that way. I get a lot of my news from the UK – BBC and The Economist magazine. Take care.
Don wrote an uncannily accurate portrait of me in this essay. Question everything is a mantra for me. It is not meant to degrade or decry, but to probe, to not accept the glib or the conjectured but to diligently seek the unvarnished and unembellished truth.
Allan, thanks for your comments. They are well said and worth saying. I like the phrase “question everything.” A nice phrase I learned years ago can be used in any and all conversations: “Yes, but…” It affirms someone’s thoughts but then takes a nice pivot to an alternative approach. Thanks for our friendship.
This article is timely. Even well respected newspapers push a particular viewpoint. A favourite ploy is to write a headline which makes the reader angry. Instead of reading the article with an open mind, we are already making a judgement and no longer asking ourselves what is behind this story. My friend sent me an article implying that students at a named UK university would not pass their exam if they didn’t say that J.R.R. Tolkein was offensive. Of course, this could make you angry. Tolkein is one of our greatest authors. However, the university was asking the students to consider how Tolkein portrayed physically his “evil” characters. Surely our universities should challenge students. Those who have invested in university education should emerge with better reasoning skills not be “clones” of their teachers.
Thanks, Angela, for sharing your thoughts. In the U.S. our finest universities are being assaulted by our president. Academic freedom is being squashed. It is a dangerous direction.
Let’s hope we don’t see book burning!
I hadn’t thought of that, but it now seems possible.