One can’t lead unless he can leverage more than his own capabilities. Scully
There is a significant difference between an achiever and a leader.
- An achiever gets the job done.
- A leader gets the job done through other people.
This is huge; don’t miss it.
Many people have honed their “get it done” skills; they live disciplined lives and are able to accomplish immense amounts of work. They are achievers. Give them a job and they’ll get it done. I admire these people, but I don’t consider them leaders, because leaders accomplish work through others.
Peter Drucker illustrates this difference by challenging us to think of which pronouns we use when given work to do: “The leaders who work most effectively, it seems to me, never say ‘I.’ And that’s not because they have trained themselves not to say ‘I.’ They don’t think ‘I.’ They think ‘we’; they think ‘team.’ They understand their job to be to make the team function.”
When you are given an assignment or when you have a vision to fulfill, what is your first thought? “I can do that.” Or, “I need to put a team together.” As Drucker says, leaders think first of accomplishing work through their team. Leaders use plural pronouns when planning work.
No doubt, a good leader must also be an achiever—you must possess the skills necessary to accomplish tasks. When a leader doesn’t know how to get work done, he loses credibility with his team and progress suffers because he doesn’t understand how work is accomplished. So for a leader it’s not “I’m either an achiever or a leader” but “I am both an achiever and a leader.”
There’s even a difference between a leader and an achiever with helpers. Some high achievers will surround themselves with a group of assistants and helpers whose job is to help the achiever be more efficient, but this is still not the exercise of leadership. For instance, a dentist may have a staff that assists him in his work—a dental assistant, dental hygienist, receptionist, x-ray technician—but all the work centers around the dentist. A leader will empower others to conceptualize and perform work on their own.
The ability to get work done through other people is fundamental to leadership. In fact, if you’re not doing that, you’re not leading.
As you reflect on your past, have you functioned more as an achiever or a leader?
[reminder]What are your thoughts about this essay?[/reminder]
[callout]Lead Well Workshop – March 29-30 Click here for more information about a life- and career-enhancing workshop. It will change your life.[/callout]
8 Replies to “Leaders: There’s a difference between being an achiever and a leader; be both”
I have forwarded this message to one of my team leaders. Thanks for sharing.
Thanks, Dave, I hope the essay is beneficial. You can also encourage your team members to subscribe to my blog so they’ll get the weekly posts. Take care, Don
When I was doing consulting in the executive development field, I believe the most important message I could give was to DELEGATE. Most of my clients insisted they were overburdened to the point that they couldn’t possibly take on any more. They were SO busy. I kept warning them that if they didn’t give some of their responsibilities to others, they couldn’t ever grow into larger responsibilities. And to do that – delegate – they had to TRUST subordinates.
“Poor Bill. He says he has so much on his plate. We’d better give that promotion to Jack.”
Cap, I can tell by your comments that you were an effective consultant, giving strategic advice to young executives. For people who like to achieve, it can be difficult to delegate and give up trust others, but we must. Don
It was a pleasure to hear you sing/speak at Ted Dysart’s celebration of life service. I receive many emails each week but I always make sure to take the time to read and ponder on your email.
Thanks, Tina, for kind words. I thought Ted’s funeral was a wonderful tribute to his life; I particularly enjoyed hearing his children and grandchildren speak. Thanks for reading my essays. Don
Don, this is a good contrast between a leader and an achiever. In my experience, I have also noted that achievers tend to be micro-managers. They just can’t help being involved in every little detail and have to have their fingerprints on every project. Leaders, on the other hand, are comfortable giving away both responsibility and authority. They are okay with sharing power.
Bill, thanks for taking the time to share your thoughts. Good insight about achievers tending to micromanage. I’ve heard it said, “it’s okay to tell people what to do but don’t tell them how to do it.” Don